warrantless search
Frequency: 6.36.0 per million words
Categories:
Examples (20)
- The President could order warrantless searches for national security purposes.
- A warrantless search is generally considered illegal and a violation of rights.
- A warrantless search is generally considered unconstitutional without probable cause.
- The police conducted a warrantless search of the suspect's vehicle after detecting a strong odor.
- The court ruled that the evidence obtained during the warrantless search was inadmissible.
- Civil liberties advocates often protest against warrantless searches of private property.
- Police officers often conduct warrantless searches of vehicles at border crossings.
- The court ruled that the warrantless search of his phone violated his Fourth Amendment rights.
- In emergency situations, a warrantless search might be permissible to prevent harm.
- Officers are allowed to perform a warrantless search under specific exigent circumstances.
- Many civil liberties advocates oppose the increasing use of warrantless searches by authorities.
- He claimed that the evidence presented was obtained through an unlawful warrantless search.
- He argued that the police had no right to perform a warrantless search of his home.
- Many citizens fear the potential for abuse of power with widespread warrantless searches.
- The legal debate surrounding warrantless searches continues to be a contentious issue.
- Is a warrantless search ever justified in cases of immediate threat to national security?
- Understanding the limitations of a warrantless search is crucial for citizens' rights.
- The new legislation aims to restrict the scope of government agencies conducting warrantless searches.
- Such a warrantless search would violate the Fourth Amendment.
- Without probable cause, any warrantless search is unconstitutional and its findings inadmissible.